About paraphrasing, or using similar phrases to say the same

This is fresh content on the subject of Synonym Automatic Replacement, using our Synonymizer product.

Paraphrasing arises to the plane of copyright infringement when there is ample nearness amidst an item and a copyrighted source. This may be present when the artistic assertion in an influential lane of the source has been nearly paraphrased, yet if it is a diminutive bit of the source, or when paraphrasing is looser but covers a larger bit of the source or covers “the heart” (the most crucial content).

A near paraphrase of one sentence from a textbook may be of little interest, while a near paraphrase of one paragraph of a two-paragraph item would be contemplated a serious violation. Editors must therefore take particular care when writing an item, or a section of an item, that has much the same scope as a single source. The editor must be extra careful in these cases to extract the facts alone and present the facts in plain language, without carrying forward anything that could be contemplated “creative expression”.

Substantial affinity is as well unimportant when important confirmation is present, showing that the volume was composed independently. A composer may believe he is being unique when saying “Charles de Gaulle was a pillar statesman”, not appreciating that abundant additional creators have independently presented these identical words. What looks like copying or close paraphrasing may thus be a bit accidental. These similarities are more likely to exist where content is less creative and more formulaic. Independent creation is less likely when there is evidence that the source was consulted or very similar words are used.

There are a rare clear-cut settings when near paraphrasing is allowed. If news is gathered from the public domain or is gratis employ content, near paraphrase may be admissible. In some cases it is advantageous to apprehend the lyrics as written, in which condition the guidelines for Citations apply. Lastly, there may be some cases where it’s arduous to paraphrase since of the attributes of the content; in such conditions, there are a duo of tips ad beneath regarding how to end point the class of near paraphrasing to avoid issues.

When using a near paraphrase legitimately, citing a source is in most cases required and highly recommended.

Automatic Synonym Replacement

Using software to automate the synonym replacement is a valuable shortcut that many writers take advantage of. The result is also an enrichment of the vocabulary, something that people that use English as a Foreign Language tend to appreciate more. The metrics of plagiarism are affected, although the spirit of plagiarism might persist. Be careful with this powerful tool.

Public domain or free use content

In some end pointed cases, near paraphrase may be an acceptable way of writing an article. For example, many Wikipedia articles are (or were) based on text from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica (see Wikipedia:1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica). If the source is public domain, such as work of the U.S. government, or available under a CC BY-SA-compatible free license, it may be nearly paraphrased if it is fully attributed. Acknowledging the author in such instances may include accompaniment by in-text attribution that makes clear whose words or ideas are being used (e.g. “John Smith wrote that …”) or may include more general attribution that indicates the material originates from a free of charge source, either as part of an inline citation or as a general notice in the commodity’s “References” section.