Why I have 2 accounts in each of these 80 social networks

I want to be able to test every social network for its promoting power for my stories. Some of them are going to be more receptive than others, depending on its size, difficulty, subject and to the importance they give to old, reliable accounts.

Social networks give a value to each user, sometimes called ‘karma’, and that value is useful for promotion of stories, either the own user stories or stories from ‘friends’ and strangers.

I am sticking to 2 accounts per network because it is well known that they detect some features that could point to spam, namely IP. Of course, IP can be defeated by using a navigation proxy, but that needs information, expertise and a potentially self-destructive desire to spam the sites. The second account is used if the first one loses value, or to start polemic discussions that are often followed with more attention.

I read about a “snowball” effect while promoting stories in the Digg-like sites, started from a minor network, where it should be easier to get noticed, and bringing users/friends/voters to the other sites. It would be useful if the home of your stories included the links pointing to the other social networks where the visitor can vote you. For that, I included a couple of plugins in my WordPress blog.

Stories are improved by user feedback and testing as they pass thru networks.

I am starting to test the power of this promotion technique, not too fast because I need my accounts to be mature enough. An account is mature when it had some time and healthy activity in the networks. As in real life networks, you cannot arrive, post your story and expect everyone admire you.

It is also good if your stories refer to the same subject, and if you develop virtual ‘friends’ that show their trust in you. It is important to complete a profile and include a photo.

This is the partial list of the networks where I am now. If this story gets enough Diggs, Propellers, Reddits, and so on, I plan to add the age, votes and karma of all the accounts, to help value them.  Continue reading “Why I have 2 accounts in each of these 80 social networks”

Our AlgoCracker Software

We are preparing different experiments with the current version of AlgoCracker. We first want to establish the value of different TLDs on Google ranking. If non-standard TLDs are not discriminated against, domains with keywords should be very valuable for ranking purposes.

The problem with TLDs from different countries is that we cannot establish the value of page quality. The .com pages tend to be of better quality, because they are more demanded and thus more expensive.

Which keyword should be analyzed? It should be a keyword of neutral value to the TLD. 

To solve that, we will use the names of the capitals of countries.

More later.

What is Algo Cracker?

It is a module in a software that used to be named Keyword Thief. This product started as a spider that extracted keywords from the top-ranked sites in Google.

In a second stage, it incorporated 3 modules:

– Metatag Thief, which does the same as Keyword Thief, but for all metatags

– Algo Cracker, an analyzer of keyword density in different parts of the Google top-ranked websites. It uses ranges (clusters) of pages, to allow averaging and comparing

– Metatag Analyzer, a spider that enters a single site, and checks the contents of all metatags.

This products are now sold together, but can later evolve separately.

See http://keywordthief.com.ar for details and free download.